Why Is the Public Sector More Labor-Intensive? A Distortionary Tax Argument
نویسندگان
چکیده
Why Is the Public Sector More Labor-Intensive? A Distortionary Tax Argument Government-run entities are often more labor-intensive than private companies, even with identical production technologies. This need not imply slack in the public sector, but may be a rational response to its wage tax advantage over private firms. A tax-favored treatment of public production precludes production efficiency. It reduces welfare when labor supply is constant. With an elastic labor supply, a wage tax advantage of the public sector may improve welfare if it allows for a higher net wage. This would counteract the distortion of labor supply arising from wage taxation. Full privatization is never optimal if the labor supply elasticity is positive but small. JEL Classification: L33, J45, D24, H21
منابع مشابه
A Distortionary Tax Argument
Why Is the Public Sector More Labor-Intensive? A Distortionary Tax Argument Government-run entities are often more labor-intensive than private companies, even with identical production technologies. This need not imply slack in the public sector, but may be a rational response to its wage tax advantage over private firms. A tax-favored treatment of public production precludes production effici...
متن کاملWhy is the Public Sector More Labor - Intensive ?
Taking into account that within the government sector all tax payments cancel out, a public enterprise in an economy with distortionary wage taxation will be more labor intensive than a private firm. However, an unequal tax treatment of public and private sectors distorts away the economy from production efficiency. In a general equilibrium model, incurring this inefficiency is worthwhile from ...
متن کاملThe Double Dividend Hypothesis for Iran Economy: Modeling Carbon Taxes with a CGE Model
The Double dividend hypothesis briefly demonstrates that by replacing different kinds of distortionary taxes with environmental ones, not only the lesser pollutants would be emitted (the first merit), but the more productivity and public welfare would be gained (the second one). Given the urgent need of reducing emissions in Iran, levying taxes on carbon, aimed at reducing carbon dioxide by 12 ...
متن کاملThe Double Dividend Hypothesis for Iran Economy: Modeling Carbon Taxes with a CGE Model
The Double dividend hypothesis briefly demonstrates that by replacing different kinds of distortionary taxes with environmental ones, not only the lesser pollutants would be emitted (the first merit), but the more productivity and public welfare would be gained (the second one). Given the urgent need of reducing emissions in Iran, levying taxes on carbon, aimed at reducing carbon dioxide by 12 ...
متن کاملFiscal policy in a Real-Business-Cycle model with labor-intensive government services and endogenous public sector wages and hours
Motivated by the high public employment, and the public wage premia observed in Europe, a Real-Business-Cycle model, calibrated to German data (1970-2007), is set up with a richer government spending side, and an endogenous private-public sector labor choice. To illustrate the effects of fiscal policy, two regimes are compared and contrasted to one another exogenous vs. optimal (Ramsey) policy ...
متن کامل